« Sarasota | Main | A Catalog Of Anticipations »
March 22, 2007
The Holy Mountain
The Alamo Drafthouse kept playing trailers last week for their double feature of those new prints of Alejandro Jodorowsky's El Topo and The Holy Mountain that have been going around, and it killed me that I wouldn't be there to catch it. But I lucked out, because the NuArt scheduled a three day run of Holy Mountain this week, and I just got back from the second-to-last screening of it; what better way to spend a Thursday afternoon than in pursuit of circa-1973 enlightenment?

Jodorowsky is one of those filmmakers I came to know before I even saw a frame of his work, through my tattered copy of Roger Ebert's Movie Home Companion. The 1991 edition that I received for my 10th birthday had a review of Santa Sangre and long, fascinating and, to my mind, frightening interview with Jodorowsky. The ideas of the images of the dead brides rising from their graves, or the trapeeze artist having her arms lopped off, were planted and quickly bloomed in my mind; by the time I got around to seeing Santa Sangre when I was in high school, it wasn't the images themselves that shocked me so much as the colorful, almost ribald physicality of them. Those brides weren't the ephemeral wraiths I'd imagined, but tangible, garishly made up corpuses. This, I think, accounts for much of Jodorwosky's power; he makes the grotesque and fantastic entirely tangible.
I saw El Topo a few years ago, on the same bootleg Japanese VHS tape that I think everyone of my generation has seen it on, and loved it with qualifications. It's an unapologetically symbolic film, but for every dalliance into mythical pretension, there are at least a dozen unforgettable images. It's this same lurid profundity that would elevate Santa Sangre so far above its pulpy narrative two decades later, and it's all there in Holy Mountain, too, along with a serious case of counter-culture idealism. Certain sequences resembles a puree of Fellini and Tout Va Bien-era Godard, with some bluntly obvious satire. Others are deliriously hippy-dippy and sometimes painfully dated; there's a good portion of the film that's hard to watch with a straight face (or, at the very least, an unaltered minset). But through it all, that imagery - strung together with an ellipitically perfect rhythm - prevails. Jodorowsky is a master of the graphic. His symbols are searing, even when they're obvious.
Furthermore, the sheer scale of the film is so impressive, especially in the early sequences, that I was shocked to read that it only cost in the neighborhood of a million dollars (all John Lennon's) to produce. And Jodorowsky's name pops up so frequently in the credits that the film winds up feeling as distinctly handmade as it is unique.
But back to that imagery. I should note that much of it involves animals, either alive, dead or somewehre in between. I don't have too much trouble separating cruelty from craftsmanship when context and cultural standards serve as buffers - the climax of Apocalypse Now is a prime example - but there are certain scenes in here that are tough to justify (I wrote about this conundrum at greater length a few years ago). I'd never for a second discourage anyone from seeing Holy Mountain simply because of some of its more egregious content; but at the same time, that content does force me to consider my own rather muddy delineation of standards. I look down on some of the images in the film, but what about the film stock itself, which is a bi-product of those images?
Regardless; I'm excited about the imminent release of El Topo and Holy Mountain (alongside Fando Y Lis, which I've never seen) on DVD. Even better, now that they're legal again, is the possibility of tours of the very midnight movie circuit that brought Jodorowsky to fame in the first place.
Posted by David Lowery at March 22, 2007 10:19 PM
Comments
Jake & I caught Holy Mountain last night at the Alamo. You're right - parts of it you couldn't help but laugh at, but mostly cause the symbolism is so graphic & direct. Jodorowsky isn't coy at all about what he wants to say, he just says it, usually with gouts of blood or graphic nudity, or sometimes both.
I feel so lucky having gotten to see it on the big screen. El Topo (which I haven't seen) plays tonight at midnight. Not sure if I'll make it...
Posted by: Bryan P at March 23, 2007 9:53 AM
I really wish I'd managed to catch El Topo on the big screen, too. I think I think it's stronger than Holy Mountain, in pretty much all regards.
But I ended up going to see Santa Sangre this evening, since they were doing a midnight screening of it, and my god is that movie amazing! I guess it didn't hit me on the right level the first time I saw it all those years ago, but it's really extraordinary. If you get a chance to see it, don't miss it.
Posted by: Ghostboy at March 24, 2007 5:24 AM
Damn you! I wanted to catch both Jodorowsky screenings in Austin so much! ...And The Transformers. ...And Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Secret of the Ooze pizza party!
Alas, I really miss Austin. I've been attending the AFI screenings in Dallas and I just don't get the same vibe. I feel so uppity at the Magnolia--it's really annoying. And no cool pre-show reels!
Arrgh. I'm using your blog as a pre-vent ("pre-" cause I'll be blogging about AFI later... Uhhh... After I get done with SXSW, lol).
Posted by: Adam Donaghey at March 26, 2007 3:11 PM
I haven't been too enthused about AFI Dallas from the beginning, Adam, and it's largely because of that vibe you're talking about. I know exactly what you mean. Even if I happened to be in town during the festival, I don't think I'd have bothered going. This Variety article pretty much sums up the problems I have with it.
I'm looking forward to your coverage - and venting! Have you left town yet?
Posted by: Ghostboy at March 26, 2007 9:17 PM